Monday, January 1, 2024

Glory In The Highest

Glory to God in the Highest...
English grammar question—
What is the "highest" here?  I never really knew. Is it referring to "Glory" in the highest, skipping the prepositional phrase? Or "to God," the highest God of gods?  So I went to it check out, and I found that some translations of Luke 2:14 read, "Glory to God in the highest [heaven]." That's a third option for the English interpretation!
I kept digging into the original Greek and found that the best object for the modifying adjective "highest" is neither quantitative highest praise/glory nor qualitative highest God. The concept implied in the words "in the highest" (the Greek is plural), is that the extolling (exalting) is heard in the very Heaven of heavens—in the highest regions of the universe; the Supreme Heavens. The most fitting meaning in the Greek is actually geographical, extending to all Creation—and that it was occurring in a continuing-tense that doesn't exist in English; the angelic armies didn't simply "announce" Glory to God in the Highest, but were announcing, announcing, announcing it.
Some commentaries went on to say that all three interpretations were possible. None are totally "wrong." Highest praise. Highest God. Highest extent of Creation.  But what comes through in the original language is that the message was meant for All the World.

 

Monday, February 27, 2023

Power without Authority

 Power without Authority vs Authority over Power

Key Verse - Luke 10:19, Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.

authority - Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions
ἐξουσίαν (exousian)
Noun - Accusative Feminine Singular
Strong's 1849: From exesti; privilege, i.e. force, capacity, competency, freedom, or mastery, delegated influence

power - and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.
δύναμιν (dynamin)
Noun - Accusative Feminine Singular
Strong's 1411: From dunamai; force; specially, miraculous power

The Premise

 from a social media post—
 "I feel like all Christians know the verses of Matthew 4:8-10, but very few seem to understand the implications when debating atheists about evil in this world. Jesus is literally admitting that Satan has the power to give him those things in this world. We are living in a fallen world and this is the why evil exists and sometimes flourishes. But what we also know from this verse is that Satan rightly feared the power Jesus would bring into this fallen world, hence tempting Him, and therein is where our hope and faith resides." 


"Then the devil took him up to a very high mountain,
and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence,
and he said to him, "All these I shall give to you,
if you will prostrate yourself and worship me."
At this, Jesus said to him,
"Get away, Satan!
It is written:
The Lord, your God, shall you worship
and him alone shall you serve."




The Reply 

We have a minor theological difference. I label it 'minor' because it does not directly affect personal salvation, but it is a different worldview.
re: Jesus is literally admitting that Satan has the power to give him those things in this world.

Jesus is not challenging Satan. "Not challenging" is different than "admitting Satan has the power." Satan was not created with that power, nor was that power ever given to him by God. Satan stole the authority from Adam by lying to his wife. Adam was created for and given dominion over those things in this world, but now Satan had control, although it was obtained by fraud and not legitimate.

During Jesus' temptation, it is quite possible that Jesus fully realizes that he is Satan's Creator—which gives the entire scene an aura of surrealism. At this point, Jesus is (figuratively) playing inter-dimensional chess. He cannot do or say anything that would tip Satan off about the plan of redemption.
The main clue and reason that I hold to this view comes from 1 Corinthians 2:7&8, "..we speak of the mysterious and hidden wisdom of God, which He destined for our glory before time began. None of the rulers of this age understood it. For if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory."
I contend that Satan was not only tempting Jesus in the wilderness, but also collecting intelligence data about Him. Satan had suspected that Jesus was the Messiah previously, and that had been fairly well confirmed when the Holy Spirit showed up "like a dove" at His baptism with a thunderous voice from His heavenly Father announcing that He is well pleased with Jesus. So Satan knew there were prophecies that Jesus "will crush his head," Gen 3:15, however, Satan had not figured out that he was talking to the Creator who preexisted time. A chief reason why Jesus didn't contest Satan's power too strenuously was because Jesus knew that Satan would have to kill him, and he didn't want the 'ruler of this age' to figure out that crucifixion was part of the plan. He had to play it cool and stick to scripture, all nice and legal. 

Why It Matters

Satan had control that was obtained by fraud. This is replaying in America, February 2023: Control obtained by fraud.  Jesus did not challenge Satan's illegitimate power at this point because Jesus intended to reclaim it, remove it from Satan, and redeem it for mankind.  In a parallel spiritual season it behooves us to be sensitive to  the proper timing. Satan's temptations offered Jesus shortcuts to his mission—a shortcut to regaining all the kingdoms of the world, but with puppet stings attached. But Jesus allowed Satan to set his own trap, just as Haman had unwittingly built his own gallows several centuries earlier.

In 2023, both in the US and globally, traps are being built and gallows are being erected by those who have illegitimately acquired control. Yes, they have power, but their authority is fraudulent. History is cycling again. 

Psalm 5:10 -  Hold them guilty, O God; By their own designs and councils let them fall! In the abundance of their transgressions thrust them out, For they are rebellious against You. 


Monday, September 5, 2022

Job's Wife – Falsely Accused?

 

Job's Wife – Falsely Accused?  

I have heard it too often: Job's first wife died. Alternatively: Job's first wife left/divorced him.

Job's wife did not die as a result of the Adversary testing her husband. There is no basis in scripture to think that she left him.  She did not have a petty and bitter personality. 

…and I am playing to win the argument.

The accusations against Job's wife are often Arguments from Silence, based on the absence of evidence. They go something like, if she was still with Job at the end then (a) Job would have prayed for her when he prayed for his friends, (b) she would have been mentioned in the restoration, after all, Job's daughters were named, or (c) 

• Job's Wife is Often Mischaracterized as a Foolish Woman.

8Job took a piece of broken pottery with which to scrape himself, and he sat [down] among the ashes (rubbish heaps).

9Then his wife said to him, “Do you still cling to your integrity [and your faith and trust in God, without blaming Him]? Curse God and die!”

10But he said to her, “You speak as one of the [spiritually] foolish women speaks [ignorant and oblivious to God’s will]. Shall we indeed accept [only] good from God and not [also] accept adversity and disaster?” In [spite of] all this Job did not sin with [words from] his lips.

-  Job 2:8-10 Amplified Bible 

In this passage, Job calls his wife foolish for not discerning God's will, and it is easy to find devotionals and Bible study guides that take Job's word for it, ergo, his wife is foolish. But Job was not racking up extra discernment points either—turns out that he too was oblivious as to the source of his testing. He tells his wife they should accept adversity from God. He is ignorant of what the reader already learned in Chapter 1, that Satan is causing his troubles.

After losing seven children and all the household wealth in a day, Job's wife finally had a meltdown when she saw her husband sitting in ashes and scraping his boils.  If we are going to accept Arguments from Silence at all, then this is one of the rare places that might actually apply: Notice that she did not accuse her husband of sin, as his friends would be doing. She blamed God. Blaming God shows that at some level, she was aware of spiritual warfare. She was "foolish" only because she had not correctly discerned what spirit was attacking them; it was satan, not God. Of course, Job was also cuckolded and could not help her with that. 

• The Bad Breath Argument

13“He has put my brothers far from me,

And my acquaintances are completely estranged from me.

14“My relatives have failed [me],

And my intimate friends have forgotten me.

15“Those who live [temporarily] in my house and my maids consider me a stranger;

I am a foreigner in their sight.

16“I call to my servant, but he does not answer;

I have to implore him with words.

17“My breath is repulsive to my wife,

And I am loathsome to my own brothers.

18“Even young children despise me;

When I get up, they speak against me.

19“All the men of my council hate me;

Those I love have turned against me.

20“My bone clings to my skin and to my flesh,

And I have escaped [death] by the skin of my teeth.

21“Have pity on me! Have pity on me, O you my friends,

For the hand of God has touched me.

22“Why do you persecute me as God does?

Why are you not satisfied with my flesh (anguish)?

-  Job 19:13-22 Amplified Bible

 

This passage comprises a long list of people by whom Job feels abandoned.  Verses 13 through 16 are about alienation: brothers (biological brothers) are far, acquaintances are estranged, relatives have stopped coming by, close friends have forgotten, maidservants consider him a stranger or foreigner, and his other servants will not answer him, even when he begs.  When he mentions his wife, her offense is being repulsed by his halitosis.  The list continues: his brothers (cousins) find him loathsome, children despise him, and the men he once trusted for advice hate him.  Amid all the abhorrence and desertion, his wife's big issue is bad breath (exhalation)? Really?  She is never accused of being mad that she is now a pauper's wife.  

Devotionals that call Job's wife "petty" for finding his breath offensive fail to recognize the spiritual aspects of Job's attack.  Obviously she did not set out to abandon him; she got close enough to smell his breath. She was driven off by the stench.  Foul odors go right along with foul spirits at work. This was not his wife's action toward him as much as it was her reaction to the demonic. It was caused by Job's Adversary who wanted to deny Job his wife, just as he had already taken Job's flocks (his ability to make sacrifices) and his children (Job's fruit).  

 

• Covenant Stronger Than Satan

So why could Satan only drive Job's wife back as far as smelling-distance? Why didn't he kill her? He surely would have desired to.  It is because the marriage covenant is strong enough to withstand the adversary. From the beginning, Genesis 2:24, "a man shall leave his father and his mother, and shall be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh."  This is also reaffirmed in the New Testament, cf Mark 10.   Remember that in the second round of Job's testing, the Lord had laid out this ground rule, "So the LORD said to Satan, 'Behold, he is in your hand, only spare his life,' Job 2:6."  They were one flesh. Satan could not take the life of Job's wife as long as she remained in covenant.

 

• How We Know

 The Bible provides additional (beyond the fact that her life was preserved) evidence that Job and his wife remained faithful in their marriage covenant. This is found in Chapter 31 (notably the same number as Proverb's chapter on the virtuous woman).  In this chapter Job is making what will be his final appeal, and he is using covenant language.  Among the arguments he makes is the defense of his marriage. Some have tried to make verse 10 into a curse rather than a defense: 

Let my wife grind [meal, like a bond slave] for another [man], And let others kneel down over her, Job 31:10.

When read from the perspective of an ANE (Ancient Near East) culture, this verse is not wishing harm on his wife.  Rather, Job is using a curse to demonstrate how serious he is. We see this other places in the Bible where a person will swear to his own hurt.  The surrounding verses show that his meaning here is to reinforce his faithfulness to his wife; "If I was unfaithful, God would be justified in giving her to another man. But I was not. "

 

• The Other Implications

At this point, Job is making his final appeal before God steps in, makes His longest speech in the entire Bible, and begins Job's restoration.  Job's wife would still be around and faithful at this point or Job's willingness to curse himself would have been moot. 

Those who try to build a case that Job's wife must have left him or died because he did not pray for her when he prayed for his friends have missed a major point.  In Chapter 42:7, the Lord begins speaking to Eliphaz the Temanite, "My wrath is kindled against you and your two friends. For you have not spoken about Me accurately, as My servant Job has. 8So now, take seven bulls and seven rams, go to My servant Job, and sacrifice a burnt offering for yourselves. Then My servant Job will pray for you, for I will accept his prayer and not deal with you according to your folly. For you have not spoken accurately about Me…"  Verse 10 is among the most beautiful of all verses: "And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends…" 

Making an Argument from Silence that speculates Job did not pray for his wife because she was not there is hollow and empty.  If any Argument from Silence can be made, it would be the one that Job did not pray for his wife because God was not mad at her!  On Job's second trial, she had a temporary meltdown. Give her a break! Apparently the Lord did.  She could not deal with the stench of Job's breath because she did not know its real source, and because Jesus had not yet spoken, "Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing will injure you." The Lord did not blame her for that one either. She was not held accountable for ignorance. The others were held accountable for presumption. 

It is not a sin to be distraught when Satan is actively attacking a family member. Even under extreme duress she did not blame Job. It is not a sin to retreat to a safer distance when Satan is trying to overpower your senses.  Backing off is not the same as leaving for good. Nothing in scripture indicates she died between Job's dissertation in Chapter 31 and his restoration in Chapter 42.   

Job's wife has gotten a bad rap.

 

 

Thursday, March 3, 2022

Why Picking Sides is Complicated for US Citizens who are Disgusted with their Theiving Rulers.




 

 18 U.S. Code, section 1752, —  

NATO's original 12 nation alliance has grown to 30 countries, many without seacoast on the north Atlantic; it has become a tool of the globalists. Ukraine was *promised* a chance to join—but why would NATO desire Ukraine? (Globalists do not have a tender-hearted desire of liberty for all.) At the least, this is poking the bear, and it could be much bigger.

George Soros has held a dominating influence there since 2012, and there are traceable connections between him and Zelensky; not proof of corruption but a definite red flag for its potential. There is video of Soros bragging that his Open Society Foundation was central to the overthrow of Ukraine in 2014, and it stands to reason that the leadership was installed with his approval.
search: https://youtu.be/BuZ4IgTqqVc   

Citizens and residents of Ukraine (not a government bank account) gave more money to the Clinton Foundation than other foreign donors during Hillary's runs for office, (time period includes her 2008 primary). The Fair and Balanced media has opted to not investigate allegations of CF money laundering. (perhaps balancing prospects of death by untimely suicide)

The area now known as Ukraine with its Black Sea shipping route has been a hotspot in Europe's white slavery, going back centuries. The breakup of the USSR did not shut that down.  
Involvement of Dark State bankers colluding with Obama
search: https://21stcenturywire.com/2014/03/21/the-latest-heist-us-quietly-snatches-the-ukraines-gold-reserves/

Obama's Department of Defense invested in Ukrainian medical labs, their number may have reached 13 or more. These were not aspirin factories.
search: https://web.archive.org/web/20170130193016/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-kharkiv-eng.pdf

Obama's administration perpetrated a coup,
search:  https://archive.ph/N7Iv1

Ukraine was one of the regions that received Jewish immigrants in the diaspora that occurred under the rule of Hadrian (135 AD/CE). One of the DNA surveys conducted in Odessa, a seaport in southwestern Ukraine, estimated that half the residents have some Jewish blood. God made promises to Abraham concerning his offspring, and centuries later after giving Moses the Ten Commandments, God renewed that commitment with a promise of "showing loving devotion to a thousand generations of those who love Me and keep My commandments." The 1K has not yet run out. 

And then there are the Elders of Zion...

 

 

 
*** But the Good News is that a conservative, alternative news source with a contact close to Marine Corps General David H. Berger was reporting that the Biden you saw giving the SOTU speech Tuesday evening does not have the launch codes.

More than ever, amidst the swirls of disinformation, it is by faith that we must walk and not by sight. (cf 2 Cor 5:7) Back here at home, the left is having anger issues; But thanks be to God, who in Christ always leads us in triumphal procession, and through us spreads the fragrance of the knowledge of him everywhere. 2 Cor 2:14.